Banned from work: gas technician suspected of negligence
Supergas technician whose name is banned for publication will be suspended for three days, then banned from working in infrastructure • lawyer: "This is the a showcase request"
- Eli Shlesinger, B'Chadrei Charedim
- ג' אדר א' התשע"ד
פלאש 90
Jerusalem Magistrate's Court decided to extend the work expulsion of the Supergas gas technician suspected of the gas explosion negligence case in Jerusalem for three days.
Judge Shmuel Herbst said that the technician is then allowed to return to work in office but would be forbidden to engage in technical work related to gas infrastructure to early April.
Police representative Jackie Ben Yakar revealed new details about the technician suspect, and said, "Investigation material shows that he had a large part in what happened. Technician test was not sufficient even according to the procedures of the gas company. Indicate suspicion of inadequate treatment of the respondent also shows events of previous years. "
"The evidence indicates that the respondent came under the customer's call late, he claimed his test was not correct, is not enough. I refer to the procedures of the gas company where he worked - and procedures are talking about not leave the place unless you found the source of the leak."
Lawyer Shoshan representing the technician told the hearing that "this is not justified showcase application that aims to reassure the public."
The name of the technician is currently forbidden for publication.
Judge Shmuel Herbst said that the technician is then allowed to return to work in office but would be forbidden to engage in technical work related to gas infrastructure to early April.
Police representative Jackie Ben Yakar revealed new details about the technician suspect, and said, "Investigation material shows that he had a large part in what happened. Technician test was not sufficient even according to the procedures of the gas company. Indicate suspicion of inadequate treatment of the respondent also shows events of previous years. "
"The evidence indicates that the respondent came under the customer's call late, he claimed his test was not correct, is not enough. I refer to the procedures of the gas company where he worked - and procedures are talking about not leave the place unless you found the source of the leak."
Lawyer Shoshan representing the technician told the hearing that "this is not justified showcase application that aims to reassure the public."
The name of the technician is currently forbidden for publication.
תגובות
{{ comment.number }}.
הגב לתגובה זו
{{ comment.date_parsed }}
{{ comment.num_likes }}
{{ comment.num_dislikes }}
{{ reply.date_parsed }}
{{ reply.num_likes }}
{{ reply.num_dislikes }}
הוספת תגובה
לכתבה זו טרם התפרסמו תגובות