Kollelim won: "Bnei Torah" petition denied
The court dismissed the petition "Nezach" against kollel networks "Ateret Shlomo" and Nachalat Moshe' • Judge Gibran: "yeshiva students should sue"
- Yehuda Halevi, B'Chadrei Charedim
- כ"ט שבט התשע"ד
Removed twice: at the end of a brief discussion took place today (Tuesday) afternoon, the Central Elections Committee hearing on the claim of the party "Nezach - Bnei Torah" against leaders include discrimination against married students affiliated with the party , said Judge Salim Joe who heads Bran Election Commission the petition on the grounds under which he will not discuss the political arguments , and the petition will be heard only if brought to him a list of yeshiva students settled themselves.
Recall petition was filed after the last election against the network of kollelim " Ateret Shlomo " led by Rasha"b Sorotzkin and network "Nachlat Moshe" by Rabbi Avraham Rubinstein , the learners ' claims that they were removed kollels after publicly expressed a position identified with the party " Bnei Torah " .
According to the index, the reason for the removal of yeshiva students had passed since the overall rules and created riots and debates about controversial political issues .
The party "Bnei Torah" represented by Eitan Haberman , who represented the applicant Eli Cohen debate on the election returns from Beit Shemesh. Their heads including attorney to represent Moshe Morgenstern representing the network "Nachlat Moshe" and the lawyer who represented Sorotzkin and network " Ateret Shlomo " .
As stated, the appellants sought an injunction against the removal of yeshiva students and charge involving reveal the list of yeshiva students who were dismissed. Judge Gibran dismissed the petition for now, without getting into an argument behind the removal of the yeshiva students. His reasoning was that to appeal on this issue "Bnei Torah" must reveal them the Avrechim list.
The judge also said that if they could disclose such records within 60 days they can go to appeal.
First response to B'Chadrei Charedim: "Attorney Morgenstern expressed satisfaction the decision of the judge. According to him, the fact that filed a list of learners proves thousand witnesses such a list does not exist at all, due to all the yeshiva students expelled indeed violated the rules which include being removed for that reason alone.
Morgenstern: "We are very pleased with the decision of the chairman of the election committee and believe that in light of the decision the case has ended."
Lawyer to represent Bnei Torah said: "His Honor heard the parties attentively and among others disapproving of the actions made apparent by the respondents. His Honor tried to mediate between the parties and narrow the dispute by way of common experience to return to the kollel in conflict. The case is still hanging, standing and it turns out, and the arguments of the parties reserved. "
Recall petition was filed after the last election against the network of kollelim " Ateret Shlomo " led by Rasha"b Sorotzkin and network "Nachlat Moshe" by Rabbi Avraham Rubinstein , the learners ' claims that they were removed kollels after publicly expressed a position identified with the party " Bnei Torah " .
According to the index, the reason for the removal of yeshiva students had passed since the overall rules and created riots and debates about controversial political issues .
The party "Bnei Torah" represented by Eitan Haberman , who represented the applicant Eli Cohen debate on the election returns from Beit Shemesh. Their heads including attorney to represent Moshe Morgenstern representing the network "Nachlat Moshe" and the lawyer who represented Sorotzkin and network " Ateret Shlomo " .
As stated, the appellants sought an injunction against the removal of yeshiva students and charge involving reveal the list of yeshiva students who were dismissed. Judge Gibran dismissed the petition for now, without getting into an argument behind the removal of the yeshiva students. His reasoning was that to appeal on this issue "Bnei Torah" must reveal them the Avrechim list.
The judge also said that if they could disclose such records within 60 days they can go to appeal.
First response to B'Chadrei Charedim: "Attorney Morgenstern expressed satisfaction the decision of the judge. According to him, the fact that filed a list of learners proves thousand witnesses such a list does not exist at all, due to all the yeshiva students expelled indeed violated the rules which include being removed for that reason alone.
Morgenstern: "We are very pleased with the decision of the chairman of the election committee and believe that in light of the decision the case has ended."
Lawyer to represent Bnei Torah said: "His Honor heard the parties attentively and among others disapproving of the actions made apparent by the respondents. His Honor tried to mediate between the parties and narrow the dispute by way of common experience to return to the kollel in conflict. The case is still hanging, standing and it turns out, and the arguments of the parties reserved. "
תגובות
{{ comment.number }}.
הגב לתגובה זו
{{ comment.date_parsed }}
{{ comment.num_likes }}
{{ comment.num_dislikes }}
{{ reply.date_parsed }}
{{ reply.num_likes }}
{{ reply.num_dislikes }}
הוספת תגובה
לכתבה זו טרם התפרסמו תגובות